The view on time has orientation only on the will which animates it. ------ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7rxl5KsPjs ------- I will speak to you. You who are in this world, in yours. The one or your codes and your benchmarks lead you to see what you want, what is normal and usual for you, by accepting what limits you, to say "it is like that". Know one thing, you won't choose. You will not choose to receive the visions or the time that will be shared with you, the attention or the feelings that will be given to you, the tears and the questions that will be allotted to you. You will not choose not to seek to understand, not to be heard or listened to, of the same importance, of the same attention, of the same depth, as that you will tend to expect from those to whom you speak, to recognize you a past, an experience, so that your words fall into the interpretation, into the déjà vu. You will perceive, what I am talking about. Sometimes you will forget yourself for needs that you cannot say, of not knowing how to make them heard. Know a second thing, your examples will forge your character and your arguments. They will betray by what you say, the confidence that you will hold, to notice the words that you will understand, the language that will have been transmitted to you, the founding basis of what you will perceive, the arguments that will make you react, to be yourself under the influence of a role, which will have been given to you. You are, and will remain so until you choose it, in communion with the reasons which will make you translate the movements charged with values, signals and information, until you reverse their meanings, at the same time. only force to define, the why. "Do you know what I'm talking about?" You will only notice what you know. Your past will be, independent of you, the lesson of your life. He will link your behavior, your accent, your laughter, your punctuation, your mimicry, your tastes, even your will, by the proof of being his traumas, his marks, his memories. You will only recognize. You won't know how to listen, until you take the cost off to concentrate. You will not be attentive, not to be devoted to listening to the affection, the thoughtfulness, to tend to notice the sincerity in the attention. You will not hear anything, to expose only what you will recognize, to understand only what you know, and not to strain in yourself, the value of the link that you limit, to recognize it "to be like that". Your remark will only be an indicator, corresponding to an echo. A tool finding in analogy, the functioning of a light reflecting a hidden knowledge. Your evidence will be the reference for your adaptation to the vulgarity of the language that embeds you, relying on the confidence of conventions to be only a common similarity. Your forecast will be the vigilance of your interpretation, to notice only the experience of your own fall, your lived experience. Your choice will only be demonstrated by the power of your will. You will refuse, the evidence from his point of view, until you defend the discomfort of your certainty to endure it. You will transmit the modulation of your opinions by your will to remain of a vocation. You will demonstrate, that the confidence that you will privilege is granted only to the maintenance of the bonds expressing the manifestation of your values, attributing itself to your image only by the meaning of your accessibility, your identity. You will communicate your will through your power to trust. Serenely, you will define the evidence of a communion by communicating the trust of a relationship, protecting yourself from exclusivity by structuring your perception of an architecture that hears conviction, such as faith in a movement that values ??exchange in the world. 'emotionality of relationships, external to what you are, the expression of yourself. You will notice, that your normality is not the depth of a standard knowingly understood by all, to convey the learning of emotions as your confidence in the value of their language. You will manifest the experience that values ??them in the existence of their vocabulary, by using words justifying your feelings by the links that you can only define by the explanation that you cannot offer of yourself, to be fair "like that" You will describe, the representation of your fellows as the experience of your revelation, the subject of yourself. You will specify, the mark of the greatest number, like the distinction of the common, of appropriating the effort as the lesson punctuating the argument of an indisputable and obvious knowledge, seeking confidence in the explanation. You will distinguish, the equivalence of the conventions of gager being the reference point of explanation linking the knowledge defining the common, relying on the inability to understand its value You will recognize, not being able to act, by recognizing not knowing how to distinguish what you know to be, to exchange what you know by the operation of a voluntary trust to distinguish what you will recognize wanting to recognize what you know to be of value . You will seek to make what you say heard like the fight to say, seeking to say what you will know for sure to be zero, to make sure you seek to understand that what you say does not stop at the depth of what you are saying. we understand from you, hearing what will be heard to seek to ensure you know how to understand what is deeply understood as void, to ensure that you tend to make your fight heard. You will understand the value of your errors in the will to defend the meaning of understanding the language of your speech, of not speaking the same language, of not hearing the same value of the language that we devote ourselves to defending for to understand each other. You will consider, the mechanics of your knowledge as the vigilance of the obvious, to protect yourself from speeches by your knowledge of listening attentively to the duty of the error by distinguishing the role of its dedication. You will convince the evidence of having to distinguish reality from understanding, to recognize from you the evidence of not being understood in order to structure it errors such as the duty of conviction structuring the error of reality by recognition named by interpretation. You will name, the corrections appearing obvious to grant the opportunity to exchange on the error of what structures his remarks, what to correct the appearance, by naming what is obvious to grant, what to know of the error to be which is obviously recognizable, relevant in appearance, only on the occasion of discussing what you know, and thus correcting what structures it, confidence. It recognizes itself by the correction of obviously seeming the opportunity to correct what appoints it, to grant itself the recognition of exchanging the remarks of its relevance. You will judge yourself, to have distinguished such as the evidence, the error of being able to you too, to judge yourself as you are, obviously to be what you distinguish from yourself, the evidence of an error. You will deny, abandon the indivisible trauma of what will mark you initially, the time spent, responsible for the perceptions of yourself. The abstraction of a present has the consequence of being able to authorize the unforeseeable and the irrational. To perceive it announces the authority of the inexplicable, and will be too much for you. To continue knowing this unreal knowledge will obviously be too complicated for you, to give up will be the mark of your responsibility, denier, that of the consequence of your traumatic knowledge, allowing you to give up by the mark of your past, the inexplicable indivisible by its fatality, and continue your progress, in the denial of what you initially allow yourself. You will redefine, your error not to be one, by the forecast that you will be able to perceive to recognize the entirety of what confidence can be in you, in its power as its events, by polarizing the evidence of your horizon by the power to foresee doubt, and to redefine, what it can be, the base of yourself. You will allow yourself to want to find in yourself the value of your confidence. You will explore, the illusion agreed by your reason of the subjects covered by inferiority, to discover the depth of your vision, probing the argumentation connecting the obscurity to the will to clarify the questions dominating the vectors fueling futility. You will perceive, the values ??inducing your present to be only the reception of information from your senses, which you will recognize, by the correlation of your past, to the importance of the gestures and the specific pronunciation of the expression, by the behavior and the tone of the words relating to the will to understand you, the consideration of a lexical song language made up of confidence, of not knowing how to give any other specific structure to the will to know you, than a link depending on the confidence to consider that the hysteria, the insults and the anger, are only the certainty of a will to define what does not know how to be, that a certainty, an invisible dependence. You will face the role of your path, guided by the evidence and the normality that founds you unconsciously, until you guide you towards the future curled up of your habits, stepping aside in comfort, to the fear of the difference which will reflect your guilt, by separating your language from what defined your needs, until you feel guilty for being incomprehensible for having become, different. You will no longer be like them, you will be sick, because the basis of this question lay in the veil of your past. Like a virus, it acted on your perception of the future, by anticipating the obvious, fueling your vigilance with disappointments, with the suffocating devotion to foresee all the needs necessary to keep it in function, and thus keep you away from '' animate the incoherent passions of the alternative, by transmitting through the resilience of hope, the confusion of the imprint of its spots, until you recognize yourself, being the subject of your own forgetting, to vaccinate yourself against yourself, to become "normal". Sometimes, we forget who we are, for needs that we do not know how to say. "It's like that". So to you the orphan of love that I would not meet, it will be necessary to accept to forget you in what it welcomes you. Resign yourself to turning your head and walking straight, refusing to remember to be what you are deep down, a little thing, equal to yourself. You will lose yourself, by the bitter taste of your adoption and its recipe, in the obligatory shackles of an imaginary world, cold and insensitive, where the lost children of a game called society reign supreme. Its rules, forge convictions by the isolation of differences and the legislation of the obvious, until the progression of a reading of yourself, to be unsuited to it. You will compare yourself to the rest by the definition that you will slowly accept of yourself. Silently dictated by others to deaf your needs, it will reveal your incomprehension to the point of crushing your own memory of yourself, masked by resignation, stifled by cowardice, overcome by the silence of the sincere wills addressed to you. This defeat is yours. That of the dream fading to achieve speaking the vocabulary of a world colliding, with a reality confronting it with the vision of the obvious. That or your ideals, your ambitions and your feelings, are imposed on the silence of belonging to you, until locking you up to master you, you, to accept being nobody, that to be someone, you, l 'misunderstood. You will eat tasteless until you secure yourself from hunger, and find the taste without wondering if it is really yours. The recipe for the future is forged with the past and perceived values, disappointment removes links and ties to disgust, their visions, lost. You will obviously accept its fatalistic reality, or disappointment will disenchant your charms by materializing through helplessness, and comparison to others, the vision of memories defining you, to annihilation. You will collapse, by the unconsciousness of the indefinite dependencies that structure you, imposing themselves on you as unbearable values, stifling your environment by their desire to feed on what makes up the maintenance of their welcome, respect. Your value will be zero. You will protect yourself from your own desire to be inadmissible, fractured by trust in the history that proves it, locking yourself in an impassable space, the mechanics of evidence, to keep what sets you up, your voluntary function . Like a bias, you will be used. Fueled by fear, put before your eyes by the evidence reminding you of your past, your needs will quickly turn to the need to build. Like a reason, it will be felt in you like that of no longer seeing you, like a reason. Overwhelmed by words requiring what you will lack in order to understand them, the pressures that you will inflict on yourself will only be those having the cost of your addictions, of having forgotten the value of your time. The awareness of the passing time, will be visible to you by the environment which will make you discover it, when you realize that you have "woken up" from your convictions. You will be sorry, to undertake by forgetting the primary needs of your existence, to have to correspond to the list of objectives indicated by your vigilance. You will prevent, by nourishing by the existence of your trauma, the deconditioning of a reality perceived by the independence of wills forgetting you in the failure, until the torments of the disappointment, the loss of the memory of your own value in the anticipation of living the existence of its reality. The "pre-reception" will reserve you for what will have been removed from you prematurely, you will no longer share privacy, having defined the sum of an exclusive merit. The veil of your past will be the message you send to the present. You will defend with the animosity of inhuman behavior, the ignorance of a deep attachment to what will secure you from the reflection of what you have undergone, in the dependence of deniers revealing your cracks to those accompanying you, you avoiding confronting yourself with the possibility, with hope, of advancing serenely in the sincerity of their devotions, of having forgotten yourself in the adaptation to nourish what exempt you from it. You will have gone astray, in your vocation to predict equations, to have left them unanswered, to have judged yourself too large for you. You will turn your back, by accepting to mask your own image by judging yourself incapable of expressing your fears and your fears, by the awareness of the probabilities of reliving these invincible situations, by protecting yourself with your strength and your courage to face them, by the silence of the future explanations that you will have of yourself, of being only what you are, "like that", repeating the abuse of the anxious to hear of their benevolence, the will of a deep rape of your self-esteem. You will secure what will be the least emotional, that the comfort of being understood, to reassure the world to be assured of being reassuring, while being assured of being insurable. You will free by the only freedom you will have, that of giving it back, of being only what you are, the same prisoner of ignorance of yourself. So who do you think you are? The orphan of love or the child of fear? The only difficulty in living is to accept your reality, that of leaving the one you want, to those you abandon to no longer want to live it, trusting in the other, being able to forgive yourself for be explicable and understanding, alive, because know one last thing, I understand you, trust you, love you and thank you, to remind me that the unconsciousness that you have is the one that I leave you, not to not have learned, how to take it away from you.